Vickykumar Gupta, a key figure in the shooting incident outside Bollywood superstar Salman Khan’s residence, has made a surprising disclosure. Despite being held in custody since the shooting on April 14, Gupta claims that his intention was not to inflict harm but to intimidate Khan regarding a previous legal conflict. This disclosure introduces a fresh perspective to the continuing legal dispute, shedding light on the supposed motivations behind the attack and the wider consequences for all parties.
On the morning of April 14, 2024, two masked persons on a motorbike arrived outside Salman Khan’s Galaxy Apartment in Mumbai’s posh Bandra locality. They fired several rounds in the open air before zooming away, causing widespread panic. The incident invited prompt media and police attention. The police arrested Vickykumar Gupta and his accomplice, Sagar Pal, within minutes after the shooting in Gujarat. Cops earlier said it was the handiwork of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang, which has an old enmity with Khan following a blackbuck poaching case against him.
Gupta has surprisingly claimed that he drew inspiration from the “principles” of Lawrence Bishnoi, an imprisoned gangster known for his extreme views and dedication to the revolutionary ideals of Bhagat Singh. Gupta stated that the shooting was intended to create fear in Salman Khan regarding a 1998 blackbuck poaching case, an issue that had caused friction between Khan and the Bishnoi community.
Gupta’s legal team, in the bail plea, argues that the shooting was a desperate effort to capture Khan’s attention and prompt him to apologize for the alleged poaching incident. Gupta asserts that the attack was not intended to cause physical harm but rather to be a psychological strategy.
Denial of Bishnoi’s Involvement
Gupta asserts that Lawrence Bishnoi and his coworkers were not involved in the attack’s planning, unlike what many initially thought. He contends that the police falsely linked Bishnoi’s name to him and that he never had orders directly from Bishnoi or his agents. Gupta’s defense team has stressed that although he acted independently due to his financial difficulties and sense of fairness, he was motivated by Bishnoi’s ideas.
Gupta’s request for bail, presented to the specialized court established under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), emphasizes his extreme financial difficulties as a primary factor in his behavior. Gupta, originating from an impoverished village in Bihar, asserts that his financial struggles and the loss of his job during the COVID-19 pandemic compelled him to act out of desperation. His legal team contends that while his actions were misguided, they were motivated by the need to address his financial troubles rather than any ill will towards Khan.
Highlights of the Content
- Motivation Behind the Shooting: Vickykumar Gupta claims he fired at Salman Khan’s residence to scare him over the 1998 blackbuck poaching case, not to cause physical harm.
- Denial of Bishnoi’s Involvement: Gupta asserts that Lawrence Bishnoi, who was initially thought to be involved, had no role in the shooting.
- Personal Circumstances: Gupta attributes his actions to financial desperation and his admiration for Bishnoi’s principles.
- Legal Proceedings: Gupta is seeking bail while the court considers the implications of his claims and the broader context of the shooting.
Conclusion
The firing outside the house of Salman Khan has transformed into a multiple-dimensional legal battle, exposing the diurnal complexities of the criminal mind and the problematic ascriptions of a guilty conscience. Vickykumar Gupta admitted to his intimidation but not hurt, while he completely denied any involvement of Lawrence Bishnoi in the same matter.
The result of the court proceedings will probably have an impact on future cases that involve similar situations of criminal influence and personal grudges. This ongoing saga remains intriguing to the public and has drawn attention from legal experts, showcasing the complex relationship between personal grievances and criminal behavior.
By
